In the fast-paced world of financial services, contract automation has become essential for ensuring operational efficiency, compliance, and customer satisfaction. For decades, many financial institutions have relied on embedding contracts directly into their core systems—such as credit decisioning tools, CRMs, or core banking platforms. While this approach offers some degree of integration with existing workflows, it introduces a range of challenges that hinder flexibility, collaboration, and scalability.
Let’s explore these challenges and how Avokaado’s innovative approach is reshaping contract automation for financial service providers.
The Challenges of Traditional Contract Automation
1. Technical Dependency One of the most significant drawbacks of embedding contracts within core systems is the reliance on IT teams to manage and update them. Even minor text changes to templates often require technical intervention, leading to delays and higher operational costs. This bottleneck prevents legal and business teams from making swift adjustments to contracts, which can be critical in responding to regulatory changes or customer needs.
For example, a bank updating loan agreement terms to comply with new regulations may face weeks of delays as IT teams rework templates, causing potential non-compliance risks and missed deadlines.
2. Limited Flexibility Static, hard-coded templates lack the agility needed to adapt to evolving business conditions or client-specific requirements. Financial institutions often struggle to customize contracts without initiating lengthy development cycles, which slows down deal-making and impacts customer satisfaction.
3. Compliance Risks The financial services industry operates in a highly regulated environment. When contracts are embedded in backend systems, ensuring compliance with the latest regulations becomes a complex and time-consuming task. Any delays in updating templates can expose institutions to significant legal and financial risks.
A compliance officer at a bank might identify a necessary change in data privacy clauses for GDPR compliance, but the existing process could require significant time for implementation, increasing the institution’s risk exposure.
4. Inefficient Collaboration Siloed contract management processes hinder effective communication between departments. Legal, compliance, and sales teams often find it challenging to access and review contracts efficiently, leading to miscommunication, errors, and delays in approval workflows.
5. Version Control Issues Managing multiple versions of contracts within backend systems is a logistical challenge. This can result in inconsistencies, with teams inadvertently using outdated or incorrect templates. Such errors can damage client relationships and lead to disputes.
6. Resource Constraints Relying on technical teams for every update not only slows down the process but also diverts valuable IT resources away from strategic projects. This dependency increases operational costs and limits the organization’s ability to innovate.
Avokaado’s Modern Approach to Contract Automation
Avokaado addresses these challenges with its no-code platform designed specifically for automating contracts and workflows of any complexity. Unlike traditional methods, Avokaado empowers teams to manage contracts without relying on IT, streamlining the process and enhancing flexibility.
Key Features of Avokaado:
1. Template-Based Document Automation Avokaado enables users to create and manage contracts using a clause-based approach. Contracts are structured into logical blocks and clauses, making it easy to update and standardize templates across the organization. Shared clause libraries ensure consistency and reduce compliance risks.
For instance, a bank could create a shared library for recurring clauses in credit agreements, reducing the risk of outdated clauses and ensuring compliance across all documents.
2. Conditional Logic and Smart Fields The platform supports dynamic variables and conditional clauses, allowing for the automation of complex contracts with intricate multi-level logic. This feature is particularly valuable for financial institutions managing diverse client needs and regulatory requirements.
3. Approval & Signing Workflows Avokaado’s multi-level approval workflows provide clear control over who edits, views, approves, or signs documents. This transparency ensures that all stakeholders are aligned and reduces delays caused by manual coordination.
4. Automated Notifications With built-in alerts for pending approvals, approaching deadlines, and required actions, Avokaado keeps teams informed and proactive. This minimizes the risk of missed obligations and ensures compliance with contractual commitments.
5. Seamless System Integration Avokaado can integrate seamlessly with the core systems that financial institutions already use, such as CRMs, credit decisioning tools, and core banking platforms. This integration allows banks to maintain their existing workflows while benefiting from the flexibility and advanced features Avokaado offers.
For example, a loan officer working in a CRM system can generate compliant contracts directly from the platform, reducing manual effort and ensuring consistency across client interactions.
6. No-Code Environment Avokaado’s intuitive, no-code platform eliminates the need for technical expertise, empowering legal and business teams to manage contracts independently. This reduces reliance on IT and accelerates the contract creation and updating process.
Why Avokaado Outshines Traditional Approaches
By addressing the limitations of traditional contract automation, Avokaado provides financial institutions with a more agile and user-friendly solution. Here’s how it stacks up:
- Flexibility
- Traditional Automation: Static templates; difficult to modify
- Avokaado’s Approach: Dynamic templates with smart clauses
- Dependency
- Traditional Automation: High reliance on IT teams
- Avokaado’s Approach: No-code platform for self-service
- Collaboration
- Traditional Automation: Siloed workflows, poor communication
- Avokaado’s Approach: Integrated workflows with transparency
- Compliance
- Traditional Automation: Risk of delays in updates
- Avokaado’s Approach: Centralized clause libraries for control
- Integration
- Traditional Automation: Limited to existing static systems
- Avokaado’s Approach: Seamlessly integrates with core systems
- Speed
- Traditional Automation: Slow due to technical bottlenecks
- Avokaado’s Approach: Fast updates with user-friendly tools
- Scalability
- Traditional Automation: Limited adaptability to business changes
- Avokaado’s Approach: Easily scalable to meet growing demands
Conclusion
The financial services sector is at a crossroads when it comes to contract automation. While traditional approaches have provided a foundation, their limitations are becoming increasingly apparent in today’s fast-paced and highly regulated environment. Avokaado’s modern, no-code platform offers a forward-thinking alternative that addresses these challenges head-on.
By embracing Avokaado, financial institutions can empower their teams, reduce operational inefficiencies, and rethink how contracts are created, managed, and scaled in the digital age.
Schedule a personalized demo today and take the first step towards smarter, faster, and more compliant contract management.
Schedule Your Demo
